[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14335992#comment-14335992
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-7116:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1662167 from [~dsmiley] in branch 'dev/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1662167 ]

SOLR-7116: Distrib facet refinement shouldn't re-compute other facet types

> Facet refinement shard request should disable other faceting types
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-7116
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7116
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: faceting
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>             Fix For: 5.1
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-7116__facet_refinement_opt.patch
>
>
> While examining FacetComponent in the process of adding the new facet.heatmap 
> faceting type, I observed that distributed shard refinement requests were 
> built by copying the existing parameters and then modifying ones pertinent to 
> facet.field or facet.pivot depending on the type of refinement requests 
> (which in turn only happens some of the time, not too often).  Those are the 
> only types of faceting that have a refinement phase.  These refinement 
> requests _should not_ have facet.query, facet.date, facet.range, 
> facet.interval, or facet.heatpmap since they don't participate in 
> refinement... and furthermore, facet.field and facet.pivot have their own 
> dedicated refinement requests and so a facet.field request _should not_ have 
> options for facet.pivot.  But this isn't taken care of, just facet.query is 
> removed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to