[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12984379#action_12984379
 ] 

Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
------------------------------------------

{quote}We could/should go do it right now{quote}

Nice!

{quote}I think the buffered deletes will work fine for non-sequential merging - 
we'd do the same coalescing we do now, only applying deletes on-demand to the 
to-be-merged segs, etc.{quote}

I think this is going to make IW deletes even more hairy and hard to 
understand!  Though if we keep the option of using a BV for deletes then 
there's probably no choice.  If we implemented sequence-id deletes using a 
short[], then we're only increasing the RAM usage by 16 times, though we then 
do not need to clone which can generate excessive garbage (in a high flush 
[N]RT enviro).  

> Per thread DocumentsWriters that write their own private segments
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2324
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Michael Busch
>            Assignee: Michael Busch
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Realtime Branch
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch, LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch, 
> LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch, LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch, LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch, 
> LUCENE-2324.patch, LUCENE-2324.patch, LUCENE-2324.patch, lucene-2324.patch, 
> lucene-2324.patch, LUCENE-2324.patch, test.out, test.out, test.out, test.out
>
>
> See LUCENE-2293 for motivation and more details.
> I'm copying here Mike's summary he posted on 2293:
> Change the approach for how we buffer in RAM to a more isolated
> approach, whereby IW has N fully independent RAM segments
> in-process and when a doc needs to be indexed it's added to one of
> them. Each segment would also write its own doc stores and
> "normal" segment merging (not the inefficient merge we now do on
> flush) would merge them. This should be a good simplification in
> the chain (eg maybe we can remove the *PerThread classes). The
> segments can flush independently, letting us make much better
> concurrent use of IO & CPU.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to