[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14383528#comment-14383528 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6367: --------------------------------------------------------- Commit 1669526 from [~mikemccand] in branch 'dev/branches/branch_5x' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1669526 ] LUCENE-6367: PrefixQuery now subclasses AutomatonQuery > Can PrefixQuery subclass AutomatonQuery? > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-6367 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6367 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Michael McCandless > Assignee: Michael McCandless > Fix For: Trunk, 5.1 > > Attachments: LUCENE-6367.patch, LUCENE-6367.patch > > > Spinoff/blocker for LUCENE-5879. > It seems like PrefixQuery should "simply" be an AutomatonQuery rather than > specializing its own TermsEnum ... with maybe some performance improvements > to ByteRunAutomaton.run to short-circuit once it's in a "sink state", > AutomatonTermsEnum could be just as fast as PrefixTermsEnum. > If we can do this it will make LUCENE-5879 simpler. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org