[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14388393#comment-14388393
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-7236:
-----------------------------------
Yep, we need a container agnostic security API like Shiro. Or we could roll our
own, but I'm not convinced that's necessary, I suspect it is such a thing that
will grow out of hand, with constant requests for more bindings to framework X
and thus give too wide an attack surface in Solr-specific code.
> Securing Solr (umbrella issue)
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-7236
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7236
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Labels: Security
>
> This is an umbrella issue for adding security to Solr. The discussion here
> should discuss real user needs and high-level strategy, before deciding on
> implementation details. All work will be done in sub tasks and linked issues.
> Solr has not traditionally concerned itself with security. And It has been a
> general view among the committers that it may be better to stay out of it to
> avoid "blood on our hands" in this mine-field. Still, Solr has lately seen
> SSL support, securing of ZK, and signing of jars, and discussions have begun
> about securing operations in Solr.
> Some of the topics to address are
> * User management (flat file, AD/LDAP etc)
> * Authentication (Admin UI, Admin and data/query operations. Tons of auth
> protocols: basic, digest, oauth, pki..)
> * Authorization (who can do what with what API, collection, doc)
> * Pluggability (no user's needs are equal)
> * And we could go on and on but this is what we've seen the most demand for
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
