[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12985513#action_12985513
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-445:
------------------------------------
The general verb is 'update' not 'index', so... abortUpdateOnError default to
true is my vote.
The extraction handler by nature takes one document. The DIH has its own system
for this that works pretty well.
> XmlUpdateRequestHandler bad documents mid batch aborts rest of batch
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-445
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: update
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Will Johnson
> Assignee: Erick Erickson
> Fix For: Next
>
> Attachments: SOLR-445-3_x.patch, SOLR-445.patch, SOLR-445.patch,
> SOLR-445.patch, solr-445.xml, SOLR-445_3x.patch
>
>
> Has anyone run into the problem of handling bad documents / failures mid
> batch. Ie:
> <add>
> <doc>
> <field name="id">1</field>
> </doc>
> <doc>
> <field name="id">2</field>
> <field name="myDateField">I_AM_A_BAD_DATE</field>
> </doc>
> <doc>
> <field name="id">3</field>
> </doc>
> </add>
> Right now solr adds the first doc and then aborts. It would seem like it
> should either fail the entire batch or log a message/return a code and then
> continue on to add doc 3. Option 1 would seem to be much harder to
> accomplish and possibly require more memory while Option 2 would require more
> information to come back from the API. I'm about to dig into this but I
> thought I'd ask to see if anyone had any suggestions, thoughts or comments.
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
