Sorry - what I meant was, I think that is only in 5.2 and 6x. Indeed,
SOLR-7364 is new and not in 5.1.

I've moved to testing the 5.1 branch. It has separate fails that I'd been
seeing on my local jenkins machine.

I've filed SOLR-7365 to address that as a blocker issue.

- Mark

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:53 AM Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hmm...that issue may only be in 6x. I was seeing 5x fails though. I'll
> check that next.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:44 AM Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've filed SOLR-7364.
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:27 PM Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I've noticed that it looks like a bunch of the HDFS tests are failing
>>> currently (most are set to nightly). I should look at this before we
>>> release. I'll try and get to it shortly.
>>>
>>>
>>> - Mark
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:26 PM Timothy Potter <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.
>>>> 1.0-RC1-rev1671632
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
>>>> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
>>>> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
>>>> LUCENE-6403
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
>>>>
>>>> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
>>>> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
>>>> should one be needed.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
>>>>
>>>> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to