[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986248#action_12986248
]
Karl Wright commented on LUCENE-2868:
-------------------------------------
It occurs to me that the name of the common class that gets created in
IndexSearcher and passed around should probably be named something more
appropriate, like QueryContext. That way people will feel free to extend it to
hold all sorts of query-local data, in time. Thoughts?
> It should be easy to make use of TermState; rewritten queries should be
> shared automatically
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2868
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2868
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Query/Scoring
> Reporter: Karl Wright
> Attachments: lucene-2868.patch, query-rewriter.patch
>
>
> When you have the same query in a query hierarchy multiple times, tremendous
> savings can now be had if the user knows enough to share the rewritten
> queries in the hierarchy, due to the TermState addition. But this is clumsy
> and requires a lot of coding by the user to take advantage of. Lucene should
> be smart enough to share the rewritten queries automatically.
> This can be most readily (and powerfully) done by introducing a new method to
> Query.java:
> Query rewriteUsingCache(IndexReader indexReader)
> ... and including a caching implementation right in Query.java which would
> then work for all. Of course, all callers would want to use this new method
> rather than the current rewrite().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
