Yes.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:29 AM Dmitry Kan <dmitry.luc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for replying so quick! Indeed, the NPE points to SolrCore being
> null. So of the following two ctors:
>
> public DefaultSolrHighlighter() {
> }
>
> public DefaultSolrHighlighter(SolrCore solrCore) {
> this.solrCore = solrCore;
> }
>
>
>
> should we use the second one?
>
> Regards,
> Dmitry
>
> On 5 May 2015 at 15:03, david.w.smi...@gmail.com <david.w.smi...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> I am pretty well versed in the sub-class-ability of
>> DefaultSolrHighlighter. Most likely the problem you see is that you are
>> using the no-arg constructor. Instead, pass in a SolrCore. It is called
>> via reflection. In 5.2 I removed the no-arg constructor.
>>
>> ~ David
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:24 AM Dmitry Kan <dmitry.luc...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We need to modify the behaviour of DefaultSolrHighlighter class
>>> slightly. When we tried to extend the class, Solr prints NPE.
>>>
>>> Is there some reason to the NPE when extending the class?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Dmitry Kan
>>>
>>
>
