Cool. This certainly answers my questions.

Thank you,
   Alex.
----
Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
http://www.solr-start.com/


On 21 May 2015 at 17:58, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> AngularJS 2.0 isn't fully baked yet, and is, as you suggest, a very
> different beast. Given that level of change, you can expect a lot of 1.x
> momentum once 2.0 is out.
>
> The bulk of this project wasn't AngularJS coding, rather understanding
> the intent of the existing code, and only then taking advantage of
> AngularJS to make that clearer. Thus, any migration to AngularJS 2.0
> should be simpler because of this work.
>
> The lines of Javascript has approximately halved in this new impl, which
> should make it all-round easier to maintain, in whichever way we choose
> to take it.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015, at 03:12 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
>> My understanding was that it will be quite a bit of a pain to change.
>> They are rethinking the whole architecture. By the same token, there
>> might be quite a lot of Angular 1 momentum even after Angular 2 is
>> released.
>>
>> To be clear, I am not really recommending or arguing anything. It's
>> not my area of expertise. It just felt like there was a small pink
>> elephant in a room and I wanted to ask what the position on it was
>> from the people actually doing the work. Or be pointed at the
>> discussion (e.g. JIRA) where that particular elephant has already been
>> examined in details.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Alex.
>> ----
>> Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
>> http://www.solr-start.com/
>>
>>
>> On 21 May 2015 at 11:17, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Well, it's all experimental at this point, I have no reservations
>> > about upgrading from Angular 1 to 2 between 5.2 and 5.3 so it's not
>> > locked in to anything. That said, what are the compelling reasons to
>> > go with Angular 2 that make it worth the effort? The argument that
>> > it'll be more supported going forward is taken as a given. Do you have
>> > any estimate how much of a pain it would be to change?
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
>> > <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On 21 May 2015 at 06:03, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Just to be clear the new AngularJS-based admin UI will _not_ be the
>> >>> default for 5.2, the default in 5.2 will still be the current UI. The
>> >>> hope is to get it out there for people to experiment with/provide
>> >>> feedback on with an eye toward making it the default in 5.3. And add
>> >>> some nifty new features between now and 5.3 that would entice people
>> >>> to use it and thus generate feedback.
>> >>
>> >> I did not see this mentioned anywhere. Are the - significant - changes
>> >> in Angular 2 going to affect this new UI? Or do we lock in to the
>> >> latest Angular 1 for a while?
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>    Alex.
>> >>
>> >> ----
>> >> Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
>> >> http://www.solr-start.com/
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to