[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14610600#comment-14610600
]
Mike Drob commented on SOLR-7741:
---------------------------------
+1
> SolrIndexerConfig.toMap missing fields
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-7741
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7741
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: Trunk
> Reporter: Mike Drob
> Fix For: Trunk
>
> Attachments: SOLR-7741.patch, SOLR-7741.patch
>
>
> From the mailing list:
> Mike Drob wrote:
> {quote}
> I was looking through code for unrelated reasons and this line stuck out to
> me:
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/trunk/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/update/SolrIndexConfig.java#L180
> if(mergeSchedulerInfo != null)
> m.put("mergeScheduler",mergeSchedulerInfo.toMap()); if(mergePolicyInfo !=
> null) m.put("mergeScheduler",mergePolicyInfo.toMap());
> Are they both supposed to be using the "mergeScheduler" key? If not, happy to
> open a JIRA and provide the one-line patch.
> {quote}
> Christine Poerschke wrote:
> {quote}
> Follow-on question, also re: SolrIndexConfig's toMap method. The constructor
> reads "/mergedSegmentWarmer" and "/infoStream" and "/infoStream/@file"
> elements but the toMap method does not write them.
> Would that be intended or is it maybe an unintended omission? If intended
> would be great to have a comment in toMap to clarify why/which elements are
> skipped, so that if/when a new element is added its easier to determine if
> toMap should write the new element also.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
