On 7/9/2015 10:55 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > coreconfig.xml has it's own problems in SolrCloud, > collectionconfig seems better. Except in that case > stand-alone Solr doesn't really use collections... > > Siiggghhh.
I debated with myself on whether I even wanted to bring this up. Ultimately I decided it would be interesting to discuss, even if we don't take any action. As potential replacements for solrconfig.xml, I find that core.xml or possibly just config.xml are the most appealing ... but the former might be confusing in a SolrCloud context. I'm biased towards cores, because the Solr indexes that I interact with most often are NOT using SolrCloud, and might never use it. I've heard rumblings about SolrCloud becoming the *only* running mode, but that hasn't happened so far. I understand how we got where we are today -- in the early days, Solr only handled one index, so the solrconfig.xml actually did configure all of Solr. Thanks, Shawn --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
