[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14643428#comment-14643428
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-3085:
------------------------------------

[~simon.endele] Yes it would.  So would the solution of converting these 
clauses to boost queries, which I did some months ago as part of a custom 
client-specific query parser, and it works fine.  

One reason I like converting these clauses to boost queries is that from a 
Lucene internals/performance perspective, we separate out the clauses we know 
aren't a must-match into the boost, which is in a SHOULD position, and is thus 
secondary since the docs in the boost can be skipped past for docs that don't 
stand a chance.  I believe this is faster than one BooleanQuery with a smaller 
min-should-match.  

Jan's patch for mm.autoRelax looks good to me.  I suggest another name however, 
one involving "stopwords".  Perhaps "mm.discountStopwords".

> Fix the dismax/edismax stopwords mm issue
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3085
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3085
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: query parsers
>            Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>              Labels: MinimumShouldMatch, dismax, edismax, stopwords
>             Fix For: Trunk
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-3085.patch, SOLR-3085.patch, SOLR-3085.patch
>
>
> As discussed here http://search-lucene.com/m/Wr7iz1a95jx and here 
> http://search-lucene.com/m/Yne042qEyCq1 and here 
> http://search-lucene.com/m/RfAp82nSsla DisMax has an issue with stopwords if 
> not all fields used in QF have exactly same stopword lists.
> Typical solution is to not use stopwords or harmonize stopword lists across 
> all fields in your QF, or relax the MM to a lower percentag. Sometimes these 
> are not acceptable workarounds, and we should find a better solution.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to