[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14715302#comment-14715302
 ] 

Scott Blum commented on LUCENE-4638:
------------------------------------

Any update on this?  In our mostly-stock 5.2.1 Solr deployment, we are hitting 
a point where we get cores into a permanently wedged state all the time, and 
there seems to be no fix except to restart the entire node (JVM).  The 
IndexWriter gets into a broken state with ClosedByInterrupt, and it never gets 
out of it, and no new IndexWriter (maybe also no new searchers) can be created. 
 This is one of our biggest operational issues right now.

> If IndexWriter is interrupted on close and is using a channel (mmap/nio), it 
> can throw a ClosedByInterruptException and prevent you from opening a new 
> IndexWriter in the same proceses if you are using Native locks.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4638
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4638
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Mark Miller
>             Fix For: 4.9, Trunk
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4638.patch
>
>
> The ClosedByInterruptException will prevent the index from being unlocked in 
> close. If you try and close again, the call will hang. If you are using 
> native locks and try to open a new IndexWriter, it will fail to get the lock. 
> If you try IW#forceUnlock, it wont work because the not fully closed IW will 
> still have the lock.
> ideas:
> * On ClosedByInterruptException, IW should continue trying to close what it 
> can and unlock the index? Generally I have see the exception trigger in 
> commitInternal.
> * We should add a non static forceUnlock to IW that lets you remove the lock 
> and start a new IW?
> * We should make the lock protected so IW sub classes could unlock the index 
> in advanced use cases?
> * others?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to