[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14727740#comment-14727740
 ] 

Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-7569:
--------------------------------------------

bq. At a high-level, the issue boils down to giving SolrCloud operators a way 
to either a) manually force a leader to be elected, or b) set an optional 
configuration property that triggers the force leader behavior after seeing so 
many failed recoveries due to no leader.
I think the difference is that in this issue, we're just trying to (manually) 
clean up the LIR state and mark affected down replicas as active and hope that 
normal leader election is initiated and normalcy is restored. Based on initial 
glance at SOLR-6236, it seems that the intention there is to actually force one 
of the replicas to become a leader (either manually or automatically).

I am not sure which path we should take, but it seems the approach taken here 
is less intrusive/safer, if/when it works.

> Create an API to force a leader election between nodes
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-7569
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7569
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: SolrCloud
>            Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>            Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>              Labels: difficulty-medium, impact-high
>         Attachments: SOLR-7569.patch, SOLR-7569.patch, SOLR-7569.patch, 
> SOLR-7569.patch, SOLR-7569.patch, SOLR-7569.patch, SOLR-7569.patch, 
> SOLR-7569_lir_down_state_test.patch
>
>
> There are many reasons why Solr will not elect a leader for a shard e.g. all 
> replicas' last published state was recovery or due to bugs which cause a 
> leader to be marked as 'down'. While the best solution is that they never get 
> into this state, we need a manual way to fix this when it does get into this  
> state. Right now we can do a series of dance involving bouncing the node 
> (since recovery paths between bouncing and REQUESTRECOVERY are different), 
> but that is difficult when running a large cluster. Although it is possible 
> that such a manual API may lead to some data loss but in some cases, it is 
> the only possible option to restore availability.
> This issue proposes to build a new collection API which can be used to force 
> replicas into recovering a leader while avoiding data loss on a best effort 
> basis.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to