[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14729088#comment-14729088
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-8001:
------------------------------------

+1 Nice work [~hossman]. The patch looks good.

> Using value sources on a multi-valued field can result in an exception if no 
> data
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8001
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8001
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.3
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-8001.patch
>
>
> SOLR-2522 Introduced the ability to reference a multi-valued field with doc 
> values in a function query (value source) such as like this (an example using 
> it for sorting): {{sort=field(myMultiValField,min) asc}}.  In the event that 
> the document has no values for this field, this feature behaves nicely in the 
> aforementioned example.  And it does if you reference in a 'fl' (as a 
> DocTransformer): {{fl=id,myMultiValField:field(myMultiValField,min)}}.  In 
> that case, the returned document simply doesn't have a name-value pair.  
> *But*, if you sort on a more complex function that incorporates this, then 
> you get an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException.  Such as this:
> {{sort=sum(otherField,field(myMultiValField,min)) asc}}  There may be other 
> conditions where this same exception will be thrown; not sure.
> The root cause can either be considered one of two things (or both) I think:
> * The longVal, intVal, etc. methods on FunctionValues need to be prepared for 
> the possibility that the document has no data, in which case it should return 
> a default value.  This means TrieLongField (& friends) are erroneous.
> * ValueSource.ValueSourceComparator could/should (?) call {{exists}} before 
> calling {{doubleVal}} in the various methods where it does.
> ----
> A workarround for Solr 5.3 users that should work in any situation is to wrap 
> the {{field}} function in a {{def}} function since that forces an existence 
> check before attempting to access the value (ie: use 
> {{sort=def(field(mult_field,min),0)+asc}} instead of 
> {{sort=field(mult_field,min)+asc}})



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to