[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14736806#comment-14736806
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-6305:
--------------------------------------
bq. trying to hold back lucene
That's the problem (among other things)... you see ulterior motives everywhere.
Just like you accused Hoss of "You just want to make Lucene harder to use, so
more people will use apache solr instead."
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5859?focusedCommentId=14080155&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14080155
Pretty sad.
> BooleanQuery.equals should ignore clause order
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6305
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6305
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-6305.patch, LUCENE-6305.patch
>
>
> BooleanQuery.equals is sensitive to the order in which clauses have been
> added. So for instance "+A +B" would be considered different from "+B +A"
> although it generates the same matches and scores.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
