[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12997377#comment-12997377
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-2934:
-------------------------------------
Point taken. I would say both ways are useful, but for different aspects. I
wish we had default parameter values, but since we don't wouldn't it be
sensible to keep both methods (toDot(FST, PrintStream) with sane-defaults)?
> Alternative depth-based DOT layout ordering in FST's Utils
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2934
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2934
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Other
> Reporter: Dawid Weiss
> Assignee: Dawid Weiss
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2934.patch, graph-after.png
>
>
> Utils.toDot() dumps GraphViz's DOT file, but it can be quite difficult to
> read. This patch provides an alternative layout that is probably a little bit
> easier on the eyes (well, as far as larger FSTs can be ;)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
