On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:11 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Upayavira, > > Thanks for your quick reply. > > Files above use GPL and MIT license , like junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and > MIT.
There is no MIT or GPL to Xerces or ant, they are Apache products. Why makes you think otherwise? > > Regards, > > Vetrik > > > > 2015-09-30 17:27 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <[email protected]>: >> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote: >> >> Dear Team, >> >> I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the following >> jar files, >> >> commonsfileupload: 1.2.1 >> xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1 >> org.apache.ant : ant : 1.8.2 >> >> >> If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you input is >> valuable and appreciated. >> >> >> Why would you want to do that? >> >> xerces is an XML parser. It wouldn't surprise me if Solr couldn't load its >> configs without it. Seems kinda important. >> >> All the files you mention above are (as far as I understand) Apache code, >> therefore Apache licensed. Why is their use a factor in your evaluation? >> >> Upayavira > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
