[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14948700#comment-14948700
 ] 

Uwe Reh commented on SOLR-8096:
-------------------------------

Uwe Schindler wrote:
  "Please keep in mind that it took about half a year until the first one 
recognized a problem like this, which makes me think that only few people are 
using those mostly-static indexes."

I reported the issue in the list and I disagree this view at both points.
1) I noticed the the Problem months ago, but I thought, that it was a problem 
of my poorly configured SolrCloud. I had to postpone the project.
2) Nearly all productive installations I know, are still running on Solr 4.x 
some even with Solr 3.6. The applications have been designed years ago. For all 
of them, there was no need to change a boring but well running production 
environment.

Yes, the new features for faceting have been announced, but I had no time to 
follow. Since there was no warning in the release notes, I thought it's a good 
idea to upgrade first. 

Sorry for being a bit off topic
Uwe

> Major faceting performance regressions
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8096
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, Trunk
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>            Priority: Critical
>
> Use of the highly optimized faceting that Solr had for multi-valued fields 
> over relatively static indexes was removed as part of LUCENE-5666, causing 
> severe performance regressions.
> Here are some quick benchmarks to gauge the damage, on a 5M document index, 
> with each field having between 0 and 5 values per document.  *Higher numbers 
> represent worse 5x performance*.
> Solr 5.4_dev faceting time as a percent of Solr 4.10.3 faceting time          
> ||...................................|| Percent of index being faceted
> ||num_unique_values|| 10%     || 50% || 90% ||
> |10           | 351.17%       | 1587.08%      | 3057.28% |
> |100          | 158.10%       | 203.61%       | 1421.93% |
> |1000 | 143.78%       | 168.01%       | 1325.87% |
> |10000        | 137.98%       | 175.31%       | 1233.97% |
> |100000       | 142.98%       | 159.42%       | 1252.45% |
> |1000000      | 255.15%       | 165.17%       | 1236.75% |
> For example, a field with 1000 unique values in the whole index, faceting 
> with 5x took 143% of the 4x time, when ~10% of the docs in the index were 
> faceted.
> One user who brought the performance problem to our attention: 
> http://markmail.org/message/ekmqh4ocbkwxv3we
> "faceting is unusable slow since upgrade to 5.3.0" (from 4.10.3)
> The disabling of the UnInvertedField algorithm was previously discovered in 
> SOLR-7190, but we didn't know just how bad the problem was at that time.
> edit: removed "secret" adverb by request



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to