Thanks Luc, I'll take a look.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Vanlerberghe, Luc
<luc.vanlerber...@bvdinfo.com> wrote:
> I came across the following bug in the Solr atomic update code a few weeks
> ago:
>
> As soon as a document has a date in a multivalued tdate field, it is
> impossible to do atomic updates on any of the other fields.
>
>
>
> I found a bug report in jira describing the exact same issue, so instead of
> creating a new one I attached a testcase demonstrating the bug, a workaround
> and later the fix for the bug to the existing one.
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, the original report mistakenly does not classify it as a solr
> core issue, but a java client one, which is probably why no committer even
> acknowledged the existence of the problem.
>
>
>
> I’m talking about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8050: “Partial
> update on document with multivalued date field fails”
>
> The pull request in there contains three commits (for trunk):
>
> -          A testcase demonstrating the bug
>
> -          A testcase demonstrating a workaround (providing the tdate values
> again so solr doesn’t have to try to reconstruct the existing ones)
>
> -          A fix
>
>
>
> I ran all testcases after applying the fix and they all passed (except for
> an unrelated file access issue, probably because I’m using Windows)
>
>
>
> I’m running the fixed version for solr-5.1.0 in a test environment for a
> while now and I’m pretty confident it’s ok.
>
>
>
> Could anyone with sufficient karma please take a look?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Luc
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to