[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-6276:
---------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-6276.patch
Patch of 14 October 2015.
No more NOCOMMITS, existing tests pass.
Still no tests to verify that matchCost() is used correctly.
Some FIXME's for the cost values used.
Improve javadoc for TermStatistics.expTermFreqInMatchingDoc.
In AssertingTwoPhaseView.matchCost() the cost should be non negative.
Small javadoc correction in TwoPhaseIterator.
> Add matchCost() api to TwoPhaseDocIdSetIterator
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6276
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6276
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-6276-ExactPhraseOnly.patch,
> LUCENE-6276-NoSpans.patch, LUCENE-6276-NoSpans2.patch, LUCENE-6276.patch
>
>
> We could add a method like TwoPhaseDISI.matchCost() defined as something like
> estimate of nanoseconds or similar.
> ConjunctionScorer could use this method to sort its 'twoPhaseIterators' array
> so that cheaper ones are called first. Today it has no idea if one scorer is
> a simple phrase scorer on a short field vs another that might do some geo
> calculation or more expensive stuff.
> PhraseScorers could implement this based on index statistics (e.g.
> totalTermFreq/maxDoc)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
