[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15003020#comment-15003020 ]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-3191: ------------------------------------ That's a good question about field aliases - a number literal, for example, wouldn't be a valid Solr field name by these rules. So I think field aliases are fair game to be funky. I don't necessarily propose we tackle all of these field name rules or maybe none of them at all, as part of the main gist of this issue though. Maybe we just get the fl field exclusion aspect of this committed, and deal with field name rules and parsing in other contexts to a separate effort? > field exclusion from fl > ----------------------- > > Key: SOLR-3191 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Luca Cavanna > Priority: Minor > Attachments: SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, > SOLR-3191.patch > > > I think it would be useful to add a way to exclude field from the Solr > response. If I have for example 100 stored fields and I want to return all of > them but one, it would be handy to list just the field I want to exclude > instead of the 99 fields for inclusion through fl. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org