[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15003020#comment-15003020
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-3191:
------------------------------------
That's a good question about field aliases - a number literal, for example,
wouldn't be a valid Solr field name by these rules. So I think field aliases
are fair game to be funky.
I don't necessarily propose we tackle all of these field name rules or maybe
none of them at all, as part of the main gist of this issue though. Maybe we
just get the fl field exclusion aspect of this committed, and deal with field
name rules and parsing in other contexts to a separate effort?
> field exclusion from fl
> -----------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3191
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Luca Cavanna
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch,
> SOLR-3191.patch
>
>
> I think it would be useful to add a way to exclude field from the Solr
> response. If I have for example 100 stored fields and I want to return all of
> them but one, it would be handy to list just the field I want to exclude
> instead of the 99 fields for inclusion through fl.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
