[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15072849#comment-15072849 ]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-8467: -------------------------------------- We'll want to do this for the FacetStream as well. I'll update the ticket to reflect this. > CloudSolrStream should take a SolrParams object rather than a Map<String, > String> to allow more complex Solr queries to be specified > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-8467 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8467 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Erick Erickson > Assignee: Erick Erickson > Attachments: SOLR-8647.patch > > > Currently, it's impossible to, say, specify multiple "fq" clauses when using > Streaming Aggregation due to the fact that the c'tors take a Map of params. > Opening to discuss whether we should > 1> deprecate the current c'tor > and/or > 2> add a c'tor that takes a SolrParams object instead. > and/or > 3> ??? > I don't see a clean way to go from a Map<String, String> to a > (Modifiable)SolrParams, so existing code would need a significant change. I > hacked together a PoC, just to see if I could make CloudSolrStream take a > ModifiableSolrParams object instead and it passes tests, but it's so bad that > I'm not going to even post it. There's _got_ to be a better way to do this, > but at least it's possible.... -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org