[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15073600#comment-15073600
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya edited comment on SOLR-8396 at 12/29/15 7:40 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
An extremely early patch, conforming to Yonik's law of patches.
# Adds a DimensionField field type (should be spelled more appropriately),
which is currently only useful for a term query (e.g. "fieldname:100").
# Added a test to TestTrie (misplaced here)
With LUCENE-6950 applied, this test works passes, so I am going to put up this
"Yonik's law of patches" patch. More work on this later.
Edit: This may be sufficient to do some *very basic* benchmarks against the
trie integer field.
was (Author: ichattopadhyaya):
An extremely early patch, conforming to Yonik's law of patches.
# Adds a DimensionField field type (should be spelled more appropriately),
which is currently only useful for a term query (e.g. "fieldname:100").
# Added a test to TestTrie (misplaced here)
With LUCENE-6950 applied, this test works passes, so I am going to put up this
"Yonik's law of patches" patch. More work on this later.
> Investigate DimensionalValues to replace NumericField types
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Attachments: SOLR-8396.patch
>
>
> In LUCENE-6917, [~mikemccand] mentioned that DimensionalValues are better
> than NumericFields in most respects. We should explore the benefits of using
> it in Solr and hence, if appropriate, switch over to using them.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
