[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15087882#comment-15087882
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-7339:
-----------------------------------

Yonik mentioned to me that this is probably legal behavior, even if undesirable 
as it prevents connection reuse for us in these cases. The problem is that 
HttpClient hits this in a way that we can not really work around to get to the 
right error and ?ignore? the connection reset?

> Upgrade Jetty from 9.2 to 9.3
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-7339
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7339
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Gregg Donovan
>            Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>             Fix For: Trunk
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-7339-revert.patch, SOLR-7339.patch, 
> SOLR-7339.patch, 
> SolrExampleStreamingBinaryTest.testUpdateField-jetty92.pcapng, 
> SolrExampleStreamingBinaryTest.testUpdateField-jetty93.pcapng
>
>
> Jetty 9.3 offers support for HTTP/2. Interest in HTTP/2 or its predecessor 
> SPDY was shown in [SOLR-6699|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6699] 
> and [on the mailing list|http://markmail.org/message/jyhcmwexn65gbdsx].
> Among the HTTP/2 benefits over HTTP/1.1 relevant to Solr are:
> * multiplexing requests over a single TCP connection ("streams")
> * canceling a single request without closing the TCP connection
> * removing [head-of-line 
> blocking|https://http2.github.io/faq/#why-is-http2-multiplexed]
> * header compression
> Caveats:
> * Jetty 9.3 is at M2, not released.
> * Full Solr support for HTTP/2 would require more work than just upgrading 
> Jetty. The server configuration would need to change and a new HTTP client 
> ([Jetty's own 
> client|https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/tree/master/jetty-http2], 
> [Square's OkHttp|http://square.github.io/okhttp/], 
> [etc.|https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/wiki/Implementations]) would need 
> to be selected and wired up. Perhaps this is worthy of a branch?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to