+1 for a 5.x deprecation release so 6.0 can remove old stuff. +1 for a git-based release
+1 for at least 3 months for people to finish and stabilize work in progress - April to July seems like the right window to target -- Jack Krupansky On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > +1 to that ! Do you have a planned timeline for this? > > I would want some time to clean up code and also have a deprecation > release (5.5 or 5.6) out so we don't have to carry all the cruft through > the 6x series. > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> I think we should get the ball rolling for our next major release (6.0.0)? >> >> E.g., dimensional values is a big new feature for 6.x, and I think >> it's nearly ready except maybe fixing up the API so it's easier for >> the 1D case. >> >> I think we should maybe remove StorableField before releasing? I.e., >> go back to what we have in 5.x. This change also caused challenges in >> the 5.0 release, and we just kicked the can down the road, but I think >> now we should just kick the can off the road... >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > Anshum Gupta >
