[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15095619#comment-15095619
]
Greg Wilkins commented on SOLR-8453:
------------------------------------
It depends on how the socket is closed. If the socket is RST rather than
FIN'd then it is possible for the RST to overtake sent data - ie to cause some
kind of exception with unconsumed data in a buffer. I have no idea if that is
really the case or not.
Jetty will to a proper close only if it has completed a HTTP message.
Otherwise the close may be more brutal and may result in a RST (not directly
under the control of java).
> Jetty update from 9.2 to 9.3 causes the server to reset formerly legitimate
> client connections.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8453
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8453
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Attachments: SOLR-8453.patch, SOLR-8453.patch, SOLR-8453.patch,
> SOLR-8453.patch, SOLR-8453.patch, SOLR-8453.patch, SOLR-8453.patch,
> SOLR-8453.patch, SOLR-8453.patch, SOLR-8453_test.patch, SOLR-8453_test.patch,
> jetty9.2.pcapng, jetty9.3.pcapng
>
>
> The basic problem is that when we are streaming in updates via a client, an
> update can fail in a way that further updates in the request will not be
> processed, but not in a way that causes the client to stop and finish up the
> request before the server does something else with that connection.
> This seems to mean that even after the server stops processing the request,
> the concurrent update client is still in the process of sending the request.
> It seems previously, Jetty would not go after the connection very quickly
> after the server processing thread was stopped via exception, and the client
> (usually?) had time to clean up properly. But after the Jetty upgrade from
> 9.2 to 9.3, Jetty closes the connection on the server sooner than previous
> versions (?), and the client does not end up getting notified of the original
> exception at all and instead hits a connection reset exception. The result
> was random fails due to connection reset throughout our tests and one
> particular test failing consistently. Even before this update, it does not
> seem like we are acting in a safe or 'behaved' manner, but our version of
> Jetty was relaxed enough (or a bug was fixed?) for our tests to work out.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
