[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13005285#comment-13005285
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2420:
------------------------------------
While I'm thinking about it - there seemed to be a number of other issues:
- we shouldn't require that the field store term vectors (we can re-analyze,
just like highlighter does)
- term vectors for all fields w/ term vectors are returned, even if I just
specify one field via tv.fl
- the response format is very verbose... we might think about a table format
- this funny restriction should be removed: "If you specify f.fieldName you
must also explicitly declare &tv.fl or &fl"
> improve term vector component response format
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2420
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2420
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>
> If you look at the response format of the term vector component in JSON
> format:
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?qt=tvrh&q=includes:[*+TO+*]&fl=id&tv.all=true&wt=json&indent=true
> It's clear that everything is a NamedList (meaning that order is more
> important than access-by-key).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
