To add another possibility to the mix, I'd suggest using something like Apache Yetus to manage commit process.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Gregory Chanan <[email protected]> wrote: > IMO reviewboard with git is strictly better than reviewboard with svn; > getting reviewboard from svn to accept my patches was always a chore -- > I've never had that problem with git. > > I have mixed feelings about gerrit. The main advantages are: > 1) automatic pre commit checks (i.e. I can have it run the unit tests / > precommit when I put a patch up for review), no extra effort on my part or > taxing of my dev machine. > 2) better source repository integration. I can see which patches have > been committed and which haven't and it's easier to submit and track > multiple changes that depend on each other). I can also set it up to > commit to the repository the way I want (i.e. always cherry pick). > > The downside is the UI is just awful, at least for the version I'm used > to. As an example, I haven't even figured out a good way of replying to a > review comment without copying the comment (from a different page!), > pasting it and adding my own quotes so it's clear which comment I'm > referring to. > > So, if you are looking for a tool to assist in reviews, I would recommend > Review Board. If you are looking for a tool to help you manage the commit > process, gerrit does that pretty well. > > Greg > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:42 AM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1; I can't see how anyone would object to adding/retaining support for >> the tool. Nobody is forced to use it. >> >> I'm curious of the move to Git allows for possibly better options. I've >> heard good things about Gerrit but I've never tried it. I have mixed >> feelings of my experience with Reviewboard, but *anything* beats reviewing >> big patch files! >> >> Mark, Greg what do you guys think? I recall you two used it too. >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:33 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7630 set up the >>> original/existing review board. If there are no objections or existing >>> ticket then I will raise a similar ticket towards the end of this week. >>> >>> Christine >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> To: [email protected] >>> At: Jan 26 2016 15:18:22 >>> >>> Hello. >>> >>> Having not used it before, I'd like to try out reviews.apache.org (even >>> though it's only been used a few times for the project in the past based on >>> the https://reviews.apache.org/groups/lucene/ listing). >>> >>> The review board seems so far unware of the svn-to-git migration. Other >>> projects have dual listings e.g. hive and hive-git or zookeeper and >>> zookeeper-git. >>> >>> If no one else is looking yet then I'd be happy to look into setting up >>> a lucene-solr-git reviews.apache.org entry? >>> >>> Christine >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> -- >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >> > >
