On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any opinions on this?
I've been focused on getting this 3.1 release out (reviewing/fixing docs, packaging, etc). I'm not sure about Object... does that mean most FieldTypes would be doing "instanceof" checks? -Yonik http://lucidimagination.com > thanks > ryan > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think FieldType should take an Object input rather then String -- >> this gives FieldTypes the option of using (and reusing) explicit types >> in addition to String. For embedded apps that fill SolrInputDocuments >> with real objects, the fields can use objects directly -- this means >> that Date does not have to get converted to a String and then back to >> a Date. >> >> This is a major API change, but I think the value is worth the trouble. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> ryan >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
