Robert Muir created LUCENE-7039:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Improve PointRangeQuery & co
Key: LUCENE-7039
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7039
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Robert Muir
The point types are now preferred for indexing numeric fields, but
PointRangeQuery has some usability issues.
I think we should make the following changes:
* {{newIntRange()}}, {{newLongRange()}},
{{newFloatRange()}},{{newDoubleRange()}}, {{newBinaryRange()}}: simple 1D
ranges consistent with NumericRangeQuery naming.
* {{newMultiIntRange()}}, {{newMultiLongRange()}}, {{newMultiFloatRange()}},
{{newMultiDoubleRange()}}, {{newMultiBinaryRange()}}: multi-dimensional
versions of the above (take arrays, a bit harder to use, but the arrays have
correct type!)
* {{toString()}} should be meaningful, it should not spew binary nonsense
unless you used a binary range!
* improve javadocs
If we like this, we could do similar improvements for the ExactPointQuery
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
