Hi,
Please find below the console logs for the above issue we have been facing:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.<init>(SolrCore.java:824)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.<init>(SolrCore.java:665)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.create(CoreContainer.java:746)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$1.call(CoreContainer.java:466)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$1.call(CoreContainer.java:457)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at
org.apache.solr.common.util.ExecutorUtil$MDCAwareThreadPoolExecutor$1.run(ExecutorUtil.java:232)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.openNewSearcher(SolrCore.java:1667)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.getSearcher(SolrCore.java:1778)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.initSearcher(SolrCore.java:920)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.<init>(SolrCore.java:797)
... 9 more
Caused by: org.apache.lucene.index.CorruptIndexException: codec footer
mismatch (file truncated?): actual footer=438025 vs expected
footer=-1071082520
(resource=MMapIndexInput(path="/var/solr/data/fk-ekl-mmi-mapsearch_shard1_replica1/data/restore.snapshot.20160204065051901/_1tdyo.cfs"))
at org.apache.lucene.codecs.CodecUtil.validateFooter(CodecUtil.java:416)
at
org.apache.lucene.codecs.CodecUtil.retrieveChecksum(CodecUtil.java:401)
at
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50CompoundReader.<init>(Lucene50CompoundReader.java:79)
at
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50CompoundFormat.getCompoundReader(Lucene50CompoundFormat.java:71)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.readFieldInfos(IndexWriter.java:1016)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.getFieldNumberMap(IndexWriter.java:1033)
at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.<init>(IndexWriter.java:938)
at
org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter.<init>(SolrIndexWriter.java:79)
at
org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter.create(SolrIndexWriter.java:66)
at
org.apache.solr.update.DefaultSolrCoreState.createMainIndexWriter(DefaultSolrCoreState.java:235)
at
org.apache.solr.update.DefaultSolrCoreState.getIndexWriter(DefaultSolrCoreState.java:109)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.openNewSearcher(SolrCore.java:1636)
... 12 more
3/1/2016, 11:19:44 AM ERROR null CoreContainer Error waiting for SolrCore
to be created
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unable to create core
[fk-ekl-mmi-mapsearch_shard1_replica1]
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:188)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$2.run(CoreContainer.java:495)
at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
at
org.apache.solr.common.util.ExecutorUtil$MDCAwareThreadPoolExecutor$1.run(ExecutorUtil.java:232)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unable to create core
[fk-ekl-mmi-mapsearch_shard1_replica1]
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.create(CoreContainer.java:760)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$1.call(CoreContainer.java:466)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$1.call(CoreContainer.java:457)
... 5 more
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.<init>(SolrCore.java:824)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.<init>(SolrCore.java:665)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.create(CoreContainer.java:746)
... 7 more
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.openNewSearcher(SolrCore.java:1667)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.getSearcher(SolrCore.java:1778)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.initSearcher(SolrCore.java:920)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.<init>(SolrCore.java:797)
... 9 more
Caused by: org.apache.lucene.index.CorruptIndexException: codec footer
mismatch (file truncated?): actual footer=438025 vs expected
footer=-1071082520
(resource=MMapIndexInput(path="/var/solr/data/fk-ekl-mmi-mapsearch_shard1_replica1/data/restore.snapshot.20160204065051901/_1tdyo.cfs"))
at org.apache.lucene.codecs.CodecUtil.validateFooter(CodecUtil.java:416)
at
org.apache.lucene.codecs.CodecUtil.retrieveChecksum(CodecUtil.java:401)
at
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50CompoundReader.<init>(Lucene50CompoundReader.java:79)
at
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50CompoundFormat.getCompoundReader(Lucene50CompoundFormat.java:71)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.readFieldInfos(IndexWriter.java:1016)
at
org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.getFieldNumberMap(IndexWriter.java:1033)
at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.<init>(IndexWriter.java:938)
at
org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter.<init>(SolrIndexWriter.java:79)
at
org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexWriter.create(SolrIndexWriter.java:66)
at
org.apache.solr.update.DefaultSolrCoreState.createMainIndexWriter(DefaultSolrCoreState.java:235)
at
org.apache.solr.update.DefaultSolrCoreState.getIndexWriter(DefaultSolrCoreState.java:109)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.openNewSearcher(SolrCore.java:1636)
... 12 more
Regards,
Janit
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Janit Anjaria (Tech-IT) <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have been facing the problem of corrupted solr index, after restoring
> our data. When we restore the data, the status shows 'success' after some
> time. But later, when we make some config changes and then try to stop the
> instance and restart it with the new configurations - the index is
> corrupted.
>
> Can someone throw light on the reason that might lead to this problem, or
> is there something we are missing in the restore process ? Some help would
> be greatly appreciated as this is a high priority task for us.
>
> Hope to receive a positive and prompt reply.
>
> Regards,
> Janit
>
