On 3/4/2016 4:28 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > > Oh my! Can't look now, but if I'm not missing something, I'd vote for > changing the pattern to include *Tests... >
I discovered that there's an abstract class in SolrJ named "SolrExampleTests" that fails with the new pattern added. It fails because it's abstract. I did not check whether there were any classes elsewhere in the codebase that would fit this pattern -- I was playing around in SolrJ. Anshum did commit a pattern change, but after I discovered the above problem, opted to rename the test instead of changing the patterns. Thanks, Shawn --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
