[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15195339#comment-15195339
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7093:
--------------------------------------------
bq. Assignee: David Smiley (was: Martijn van Groningen)
Hmm [~dsmiley], why do you assign [~martijn.v.groningen]'s recent
{{MemoryIndex}} issues to yourself? This confuses me, e.g. this one is already
pushed.
I think you did the same for his recent issue adding doc values.
bq. Mike, just curious, what scares you about BytesRefArray? (I make no
objection to any of your feedback above)
It's a very very expert internal class, it has scary package-private methods,
we should not be making it more public.
It also duplicates various other "append byte[] to big pool of byte[] blocks"
that Lucene has and we should at some point consolidate, yet they all have
small but important differences in their behavior.
> MemoryIndex does not support points
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7093
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7093
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Fix For: 6.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7093.patch, LUCENE-7093.patch, LUCENE-7093.patch
>
>
> I realized this glancing at LUCENE-7091.
> I think this should have points support or else people cannot move off of the
> deprecated LegacyXXX encodings?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
