[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218211#comment-15218211
]
Ryan Ernst edited comment on LUCENE-7150 at 3/30/16 4:00 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the patch [~daddywri]! I'm a little confused about the use of a
constant for radians to meters, that assumes a sphere model right? Yet the
patch uses the WGS84 planet model, which is a spheroid? If we are going to
start with a this simple approach (which is perfect!) should the query use
PlanetModel.SPHERE?
I also think using the same constant that we calculate for haversin is
important? We currently have this defined as 6_378_137 meters for the radius in
GeoUtils (Mike, +1 to sharing this so we don't redefine this stuff multiple
times). If we use that constant, and a sphere model, then presumably we should
get the exact same hit counts right?
was (Author: rjernst):
Thanks for the patch [~daddywri]! I'm a little confused about the use of a
constant for radians to meters, that assumes a sphere model right? Yet the
patch uses the WGS84 planet model, which is a spheroid? If we are going to
start with a this simple approach (which is perfect!) should the query use
PlanetMode.SPHERE?
I also think using the same constant that we calculate for haversin is
important? We currently have this defined as 6_378_137 meters for the radius in
GeoUtils (Mike, +1 to sharing this so we don't redefine this stuff multiple
times). If we use that constant, and a sphere model, then presumably we should
get the exact same hit counts right?
> geo3d public APIs should match the 2D apis?
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7150
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7150
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Attachments: LUCENE-7150.patch, LUCENE-7150.patch, LUCENE-7150.patch
>
>
> I'm struggling to benchmark the equivalent to
> {{LatLonPoint.newDistanceQuery}} in the geo3d world.
> Ideally, I think we'd have a {{Geo3DPoint.newDistanceQuery}}? And it would
> take degrees, not radians, and radiusMeters, not an angle?
> And if I index and search using {{PlanetModel.SPHERE}} I think it should
> ideally give the same results as {{LatLonPoint.newDistanceQuery}}, which uses
> haversin.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
