[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15218757#comment-15218757
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-8396:
--------------------------------------------
I'm assuming weeks. There are some issues that we need to figure out how to get
around, e.g. LUCENE-7096, LUCENE-7086.
If the patch in LUCENE-7096 is committed, the patch here will be broken due to
{{Maybe we should revert the single-valued points support as well?}}. I am
thinking on ways to proceed if/once that happens.
> Investigate PointField to replace NumericField types
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-8396
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8396
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Attachments: SOLR-8396.patch, SOLR-8396.patch
>
>
> In LUCENE-6917, [~mikemccand] mentioned that DimensionalValues are better
> than NumericFields in most respects. We should explore the benefits of using
> it in Solr and hence, if appropriate, switch over to using them.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
