[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15220827#comment-15220827
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-7152:
-------------------------------------
I think we can do it separately, actually a "proper" sloppy sin is not really
that bad, its more about api visibility, i hate that cos is already public and
i don't think we should expose a trig library :) If e.g. bounding box code is
in the same package as haversin, then this can be done package-private and its
another story. But yeah, followup I think?
> Refactor lucene-spatial GeoUtils to core
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7152
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7152
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Nicholas Knize
> Attachments: LUCENE-7152.patch
>
>
> {{GeoUtils}} contains a lot of common spatial mathematics that can be reused
> across multiple packages. As discussed in LUCENE-7150 this issue will
> refactor GeoUtils to a new {{o.a.l.util.geo}} package in core that can be the
> home for other reusable spatial utility classes required by field and query
> implementations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
