-0 for my previous reasons: 1. The new points feature should have been treated as experimental in 6.0. 2. The rest of Lucene should not have been switched over to this largely unbaked, experimental points feature so soon. 3. The current 5.x numerics should not have been deprecated so soon, with the points numerics so unbaked and so experimental. 4. The naming and terminology of the points feature is just plain bad - confusing/conflating scalar numeric values and spatial data. 5. Given the degree to which Solr and Lucene are linked and the prominence of Lucene switching from current numerics to points, it would be appropriate for Solr to explicitly note that it still uses the 5.x-compatible numerics and will continue to do so until a reasonable migration/upgrade story for existing numeric data is in place.
Adding this less-controversial point: 5. It should have been stated explicitly that Java 1.9 is not supported at this time. That said, I don't expect 6.0 to be held up for any of my personal complaints. I simply wanted to avoid anyone having the impression that I found the current status of handling of numerics and points to be acceptable. I don't expect any change, but I cannot say anything positive about this state of affairs. None of this should reflect negatively on the RM or the artifacts or logistical process of the release. -- Jack Krupansky On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure what I'm doing, but > > SUCCESS! [1:55:30.799304] > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Please vote for the RC2 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. >> >> Artifacts: >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3 >> >> Smoke tester: >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC2-rev48c80f91b8e5cd9b3a9b48e6184bd53e7619e7e3 >> >> Here's my +1: >> >> SUCCESS! [0:28:59.770357] >> >> - Nick Knize >> > > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev > Principal Engineer, > Grid Dynamics > > <http://www.griddynamics.com> > <[email protected]> >
