[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15236567#comment-15236567 ]
Karl Wright edited comment on LUCENE-7202 at 4/12/16 4:32 AM: -------------------------------------------------------------- My proposal is as follows: The module names would include: - spatial-ellipsoid - spatial-plane - (+ one other TBD, since I don't know what really distinguishes the "point" implementation from the other 2D implementation) The implementation strategies could be called "ellipsoidal" or "planar" correspondingly. was (Author: kwri...@metacarta.com): My proposal is as follows: The module names would include: - spatial-ellipsoid - spatial-planar - (+ one other TBD, since I don't know what really distinguishes the "point" implementation from the other 2D implementation) The implementation strategies could be called "ellipsoidal" or "planar" correspondingly. > Come up with a comprehensive proposal for naming spatial modules and > technologies > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-7202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7202 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: modules/sandbox, modules/spatial, modules/spatial3d > Affects Versions: master > Reporter: Karl Wright > > There are three different spatial implementations circulating at the moment, > and nobody seems happy with the naming of them. For each implementation > strategy, we need both a module name and a descriptive technology name that > we can use to distinguish one from the other. I would expect the following > people to have an interest in this process: [~rcmuir], [~dsmiley], > [~mikemccand], etc. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org