[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15236567#comment-15236567
]
Karl Wright edited comment on LUCENE-7202 at 4/12/16 4:32 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
My proposal is as follows: The module names would include:
- spatial-ellipsoid
- spatial-plane
- (+ one other TBD, since I don't know what really distinguishes the "point"
implementation from the other 2D implementation)
The implementation strategies could be called "ellipsoidal" or "planar"
correspondingly.
was (Author: [email protected]):
My proposal is as follows: The module names would include:
- spatial-ellipsoid
- spatial-planar
- (+ one other TBD, since I don't know what really distinguishes the "point"
implementation from the other 2D implementation)
The implementation strategies could be called "ellipsoidal" or "planar"
correspondingly.
> Come up with a comprehensive proposal for naming spatial modules and
> technologies
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7202
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7202
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: modules/sandbox, modules/spatial, modules/spatial3d
> Affects Versions: master
> Reporter: Karl Wright
>
> There are three different spatial implementations circulating at the moment,
> and nobody seems happy with the naming of them. For each implementation
> strategy, we need both a module name and a descriptive technology name that
> we can use to distinguish one from the other. I would expect the following
> people to have an interest in this process: [~rcmuir], [~dsmiley],
> [~mikemccand], etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
