Go for it Tim! Let us try to get it in with the test and if you need a bit of time for that, let me know.
If you think getting the test would take a lot of time, let us at least get the fix in 5.5.1 if you are confident about the fix. On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Timothy Potter <thelabd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Anshum, > > I think we should also consider SOLR-8908 for 5.5.1, it's a pretty bad > leak esp. in envs that make lots of reloads due to schema edits. I > have a fix up, but am struggling to create a test for it atm. > > Tim > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Bram Van Dam <bram.van...@intix.eu> > wrote: > > On 11/04/16 19:04, Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote: > >> I'd like someone to backport the following: > >> SOLR-8838 > >> SOLR-8082 > >> SOLR-8865 > > > > Can we please add SOLR-8145 to that list? It fixes an incorrect > > oom_killer argument in the startupt script and a Jetty warning on > startup. > > > > Please let me know if you'd like me to help test 5.5.1. > > > > - Bram > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Anshum Gupta
