[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15241575#comment-15241575
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-6637:
------------------------------------
While working on SOLR-5750 (Collection level backup/restore), I read the code
for RestoreCore and I'm confused why the "prefer local copy" logic is expressly
avoided for these file extensions: .si, .liv, and the segments_. Why these
files? It seems arbitrary and there are no comments saying why. Do you know
[~varunthacker]?
> Solr should have a way to restore a core
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6637
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6637
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Varun Thacker
> Assignee: Varun Thacker
> Fix For: 5.2, master
>
> Attachments: SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch,
> SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch,
> SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch, SOLR-6637.patch
>
>
> We have a core backup command which backs up the index. We should have a
> restore command too.
> This would restore any named snapshots created by the replication handlers
> backup command.
> While working on this patch right now I realized that during backup we only
> backup the index. Should we backup the conf files also? Any thoughts? I could
> separate Jira for this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
