So the general idea is to add the version-to-be-released on every branch from which a version will likely be cut in the future. In this case that includes 5_5, 5x, 6_0, 6x, and master. I think you should run addVersion.py on 6_0, since a 6.0.1 release seems quite likely, but the script itself may need changes to make that work.
And I think you’re right: there are two stable branches: 5x and 6x. There should be no problem on 5x, but again, 6x may require script changes to make it work. Sorry I can’t be more specific; you’re treading new ground here. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Apr 27, 2016, at 3:18 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > I looked at it Steve but it's unclear in cases of release like this one i.e. > 5x release going out when 6.0 is already out. > The stable branch as per definition is 6x (and I guess 5x?). > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > Anshum, > > Have you seen > https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo#Update_Version_Numbers_in_the_Source_Code > ? > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Apr 27, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Can someone confirm the steps to update version numbers in source code for > > the 5.5.1 release? Here's my understanding: > > * on branch_5_5: addVersion.py 5.5.1 > > * Using the commit id from previous step, run addVersion.py on branch_5x > > > > * Should we also be running this on master, 6x, and 6.0 branches? > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > Yes, I missed the JIRA comment. Do you want to take it up? > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anshum, is it okay to backport SOLR-8082 to 5.5.1? - Steve > > > > > On Apr 27, 2016, at 11:46 AM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Yonik. I'll wait for this. > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Hey Tim, Sorry about going slow but there were a ton of back-ports. > > > > I'm just waiting on Yonik or someone else who understands things better > > > > to > > > > back-port SOLR-8886 > > > > > > Ha, I saw that scroll past. but didn't realize I was being pinged. > > > I'll take a look at it tomorrow. > > > > > > -Yonik > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > -- > Anshum Gupta --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
