I think there were no Lucene changes in this release vs 5.5.0? So maybe the release notes should simply say:
Lucene is perfect and has no bugs. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > Here is a draft of the release notes. Feel free to edit and fix something > that I missed, > > Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote551 > Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote551 > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 SUCCESS! [0:57:52.080980] >> >> Le mar. 3 mai 2016 à 19:36, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> a >> écrit : >> >>> FYI, we generally don't consider weekends for the 72 hour window so we'd >>> be waiting until Wednesday to close this one out. >>> Thought I'd let everyone who's waiting know about this. >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.5.1. >>>> >>>> Artifacts: >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58 >>>> >>>> Smoke tester: >>>> >>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.5.1-RC1-revc08f17bca0d9cbf516874d13d221ab100e5b7d58 >>>> >>>> >>>> Here's my +1: >>>> >>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:44.452268] >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Anshum Gupta >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Anshum Gupta >>> >> > > > -- > Anshum Gupta >
