[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15300629#comment-15300629
]
Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-9150:
----------------------------------
bq. Am I right assuming that Solr does not simply rely on the field naming to
know the type of a dynamic field? Or does it?
Solr *does* simply rely on the field name to know the field type for a dynamic
field. Dynamic field names are of the form {{\*suffix}} or {{prefix\*}} - i.e.
a glob that matches field names that include a fixed suffix or prefix\[1].
There is a single fieldtype associated with each dynamic field, so once a match
is made, the fieldtype is also known.
bq. This does not necessarily has to be implemented in the core engine: I would
be happy with any solution, that allowed me to create fields without having to
query the current schema of a collection and then issue massive number of
schema change requests.
Note that you can send a single request that contains any number of changes,
though if any one fails, none are applied.
\[1] There can also be a {{\*}} dynamic field, which matches all field names.
> Add configuration option to strip type postfix from dynamic field name on
> document indexing
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9150
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9150
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Server
> Affects Versions: 6.0
> Reporter: Peter Horvath
>
> In some cases, incorporating field type indication to the name of a dynamic
> field is not desirable.
> It would be great if there was a configuration option (global, instance level
> or collection-level), which instructed Solr to create dynamic fields with the
> type postfix stripped.
> For example, suppose the schema contained a dynamic field with a name of
> "*_i". If the user attempts to index a document with a "cost_i" field, but no
> explicit "cost_i" field is defined in the schema, then a "cost" field
> (without "_i" postfix) would be created with the field type and analysis
> defined for "*_i". As a result queries could be executed against the dynamic
> field being referred to without the type indicator postfix: "cost:10"
> To retain backward compatibility, this feature should have to be enabled
> explicitly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
