[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13019827#comment-13019827 ]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2956: ----------------------------------------- bq. Maybe once LUCENE-2312 sequence ids work for deletes, we can look at creating a separate branch that implements seq id deletes for all segments, and compare with the BV approach. Eg, performance, memory usage, and simplicity. I don't think we need to create a different branch until then DWPT will be no trunk and we can simply compare to trunk, no? > Support updateDocument() with DWPTs > ----------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2956 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2956 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Index > Affects Versions: Realtime Branch > Reporter: Michael Busch > Assignee: Simon Willnauer > Priority: Minor > Fix For: Realtime Branch > > Attachments: LUCENE-2956.patch, LUCENE-2956.patch > > > With separate DocumentsWriterPerThreads (DWPT) it can currently happen that > the delete part of an updateDocument() is flushed and committed separately > from the corresponding new document. > We need to make sure that updateDocument() is always an atomic operation from > a IW.commit() and IW.getReader() perspective. See LUCENE-2324 for more > details. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org