[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15403656#comment-15403656
]
Pat commented on SOLR-2499:
---------------------------
Thank you for your explanations. If I understand it correctly, you would
suggest to index the values to be boosted with a higher frequency (e.g. index
the value twice)?
A useful resource to achieve it with payloads:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/2009/08/05/getting-started-with-payloads/
> Index-time boosts for multivalue fields are consolidated
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2499
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2499
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.1, 3.2, 4.0-ALPHA
> Reporter: Neil Hooey
> Labels: boost, multivalue, multivalued
>
> Currently, if you boost a value in a multivalue field during index time, the
> boosts are consolidated for every field, and the individual values are lost.
> So, for example, given a list of photos with a multivalue field "keywords",
> and a boost for a keyword assigned to a photo corresponds to the number of
> times that photo was downloaded after searching for that particular keyword,
> we have documents like this:
> {code}
> photo1: Photo of a cat by itself
> keywords: [ cat:600 feline:100 ]
> => boost total = 700
> photo2: Photo of a cat driving a truck
> keywords: [ cat:100 feline:90 animal:80 truck:1000 ]
> => boost total = 1270
> {code}
> If you search for "cat feline", photo2 will rank higher, since the boost of
> "cat-like" words was consolidated with the "truck" boost anomaly. Whereas
> photo1, which has more downloads for "cat" and "feline", ranks lower with a
> lower consolidated boost, even though the total boost for the relevant
> keywords is higher than for photo1.
> *Intuitively, the boosts should be separate, so only the boosts for the terms
> searched will be counted.*
> Given the current behaviour, you are forced to do one of the following:
> 1. Assemble all of the multi-values into a string, and use payloads in place
> of boosts.
> 2. Use dynamic fields, such as keyword_*, and boost them independently.
> Neither of these solutions are ideal, as using payloads requires writing your
> own BoostingTermQuery, and defining a new dynamic field per multi-value makes
> searching more difficult than with multivalue fields.
> There's a blog entry that describes the current behaviour:
> http://blog.kapilchhabra.com/2008/01/solr-index-time-boost-facts-2
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
