[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15456390#comment-15456390
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on LUCENE-7434:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user tballison opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/75

    LUCENE-7434, first draft

    LUCENE-7434, first draft

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/tballison/lucene-solr master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/75.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #75
    
----
commit c37f1e0d66f1f28a5c83033d9496cc33c55f265e
Author: tballison <talli...@mitre.org>
Date:   2016-09-01T19:33:55Z

    LUCENE-7434, first draft

----


> Add minNumberShouldMatch parameter to SpanNearQuery
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7434
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7434
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core/search
>            Reporter: Tim Allison
>            Priority: Minor
>
> On the user list, Saar Carmi asked about a new type of SpanQuery that would 
> allow for something like BooleanQuery's minimumNumberShouldMatch
> bq. Given a set of search terms (t1, t2, t3, ti), return all documents where 
> in a sequence of x=10 tokens at least c=3 of the search terms appear within 
> the sequence.
> I _think_ we can modify SpanNearQuery fairly easily to accommodate this.  
> I'll submit a PR in the next few days.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to