[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15477310#comment-15477310
 ] 

Colvin Cowie edited comment on SOLR-9490 at 9/9/16 3:21 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

Unfortunately I don't think that I personally can provide a unit test (without 
getting approval to do so).

However I can reproduce the error reliably just by deploying the cloud example 
and creating a document:

{noformat}
solr stop -all

rm -rf ../example/cloud
solr -e cloud -noprompt
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/update -d "[ {\"f_b\": true, 
\"id\": \"1\" }, {\"f_b\": false, \"id\": \"2\" }]"
{noformat}
http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/select?facet.field=f_b&facet=on&indent=on&q=*:*&wt=json

{noformat}
{
  "responseHeader":{
    "zkConnected":true,
    "status":0,
    "QTime":78,
    "params":{
      "q":"*:*",
      "facet.field":"f_b",
      "indent":"on",
      "facet":"on",
      "wt":"json"}},
  "response":{"numFound":2,"start":0,"maxScore":1.0,"docs":[
      {
        "f_b":false,
        "id":"1",
        "_version_":1545007494796935168},
      {
        "f_b":false,
        "id":"2",
        "_version_":1545007494796935168}]
  },
  "facet_counts":{
    "facet_queries":{},
    "facet_fields":{
      "f_b":[
        "false",1,
        "true",1]},
    "facet_ranges":{},
    "facet_intervals":{},
    "facet_heatmaps":{}}}
{noformat}

The strange thing however, is that when I try and reproduce the problem with 
our actual configuration and test data which fails on the javabin response, I 
struggle to get the json response to produce the wrong result as above. It 
appears in that case that {{toExternal()}} isn't being called at all. I don't 
know enough about the code to know why/how it would be bypassing 
{{toExternal()}} in that case though.


was (Author: cjcowie):
Unfortunately I don't think that I personally can provide a unit test (without 
getting approval to do so).

However I can reproduce the error reliably just by deploying the cloud example 
and creating a document:

{noformat}
solr stop -all

rm -rf ../example/cloud
solr -e cloud -noprompt
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/update -d "[ {\"f_b\": true, 
\"id\": \"1\" }, {\"f_b\": false, \"id\": \"2\" }]"
{noformat}
http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/select?facet.field=f_b&facet=on&indent=on&q=*:*&wt=json

{noformat}
{
  "responseHeader":{
    "zkConnected":true,
    "status":0,
    "QTime":78,
    "params":{
      "q":"*:*",
      "facet.field":"f_b",
      "indent":"on",
      "facet":"on",
      "wt":"json"}},
  "response":{"numFound":2,"start":0,"maxScore":1.0,"docs":[
      {
        "f_b":false,
        "id":"1",
        "_version_":1545007494796935168},
      {
        "f_b":false,
        "id":"2",
        "_version_":1545007494796935168}]
  },
  "facet_counts":{
    "facet_queries":{},
    "facet_fields":{
      "f_b":[
        "false",1,
        "true",1]},
    "facet_ranges":{},
    "facet_intervals":{},
    "facet_heatmaps":{}}}
{noformat}

The strange thing however, is that when I try and reproduce the problem with 
our actual configuration and test data which fails on the javabin response, I 
struggle to get the json response to produce the wrong result as above. It 
appears in that case that {code}toExternal(){code} isn't being called at all. I 
don't know enough about the code to know why/how it would be bypassing 
{code}toExternal(){code} in that case though.

> BoolField always returning false for non-DV fields?
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9490
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9490
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>    Affects Versions: 6.2
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Priority: Critical
>
> 2 diff users posted comments in SOLR-9187 indicating that changes introduced 
> in that issue have broken BoolFields that do *not* use DocValues...
> [~cjcowie]...
> {quote}
> Hi, I've just picked up 6.2.0. It seems that the change to toExternal() in 
> BoolField now means that booleans without DocValues return null, which then 
> turns into Boolean.FALSE in toObject() regardless of whether the value is 
> true or false.
> e.g. with this schema, facet counts are correct, the returned values are 
> wrong.
> {code}
> <field name="f_EVE64" type="boolean" indexed="true" stored="true" 
> required="false" multiValued="false"/>
> <fieldType name="boolean" class="solr.BoolField" sortMissingLast="true"/>
> {code}
> {code}
> "response":{"numFound":2,"start":0,"maxScore":1.0,"docs":[
>       {
>         "id":"124",
>         "f_EVE64":false,
>         "_version_":1544828487600177152},
>       {
>         "id":"123",
>         "f_EVE64":false,
>         "_version_":1544828492458229760}]
>   },
>   "facet_counts":{
>     "facet_queries":{},
>     "facet_fields":{
>       "f_EVE64":[
>         "false",1,
>         "true",1]},
> {code}
> Could toExternal() perhaps fallback to how it originally behaved? e.g.
> {code}
> if (f.binaryValue() == null) {
>       return indexedToReadable(f.stringValue());
> }
> {code}
> {quote}
> [~pavan_shetty]...
> {quote}
> I downloaded solr version 6.2.0 (6.2.0 
> 764d0f19151dbff6f5fcd9fc4b2682cf934590c5 - mike - 2016-08-20 05:41:37) and 
> installed my core.
> In my schema.xml i have an field like following :
> <field name="stock_status" type="boolean" indexed="true" stored="true" 
> multiValued="false"/>
> Now i am accessing this field using SolrJ (6.1.0). But i am always getting 
> false value for above field even though it contains true boolean value. This 
> is happening for all boolean fields.
> http://localhost:8983/solr...wt=javabin&version=2 HTTP/1.1
> It is working fine in other response writer.
> If i change the solr version to 6.1.0, with same SolrJ, it starts working. So 
> clearly this is a bug in version 6.2.0.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to