[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Cassandra Targett closed SOLR-4434.
-----------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 6.0)
                       (was: 4.9)

Again, I think the bin/solr script has allowed documentation modifications that 
take care of this issue.

> Developer Curb Appeal: Better options than the manual copy step, and doc 
> changes
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4434
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4434
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SolrCloud
>    Affects Versions: 4.1
>            Reporter: Mark Bennett
>
> We make developers manually copy the example directory to a named shard 
> directory.
> Doc references:
> http://lucidworks.lucidimagination.com/display/solr/Getting+Started+with+SolrCloud
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud
> Sample commands:
> cp -r example shard1
> cp -r example shard2
> The doc is perhaps geared towards a developer laptop, so in that case you 
> really would need to make sure they have different names.
> But if you're running on a more realistic multi-node system, let's say 4 
> nodes handling 2 shards, the the actual shard allocation (shard1 vs. shard2) 
> will be fixed by the order each node is started in FOR THE FIRST TIME.
> At a minimum, we should do a better job of explaining the somewhat arbitrary 
> nature of the destination directories, and that the start order is what 
> really matters.
> We should also document that the actual shard assignment will not change, 
> regardless of the name, and where this information is persisted?
> Could we have an intelligent guess as to what template directory to use, and 
> do the copy when the node is first started.
> It's apparently also possible to startup the first Solr node with no cores 
> and just point it at a template.  This would be good to document.  There's 
> currently a bug in the Web UI if you do this, but I'll be logging another 
> JIRA for that.
> When combined with all the other little details of bringing up Solr Cloud 
> nodes, this is confusing to a newcomer and midly annoying.  Other engines 
> don't require this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to