[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15497815#comment-15497815
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on SOLR-9526:
--------------------------------

I have no idea if other parts of the tutorial are totally broken, but my 
biggest question first and foremost is WTF is up with "strings" being the 
defaultFieldType in data_driven_schema_configs???? that makes no sense to me at 
all.

It appears it's been that way since commit 0ff1e75b for SOLR-6779, but there's 
no explanation i can see in that jira as to why this change was made.

Has this really been broken this horiffically since 5.0?!?!?!


> data_driven configs defaults to "strings" for unmapped fields, makes most 
> fields containing "textual content" unsearchable, breaks tutorial examples
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9526
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9526
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>
> James Pritchett pointed out on the solr-user list that this sample query from 
> the quick start tutorial matched no docs (even though the tutorial text says 
> "The above request returns only one document")...
> http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/select?wt=json&indent=true&q=name:foundation
> The root problem seems to be that the add-unknown-fields-to-the-schema chain 
> in data_driven_schema_configs is configured with...
> {code}
> <str name="defaultFieldType">strings</str>
> {code}
> ...and the "strings" type uses StrField and is not tokenized.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to